Abortion, the Male Fertility Crisis and the Modern Assault on Childhood

A Western Fertility Crisis; The Amazing Truth About Population Decline Which Liberals Don't Want You to Know...

A Liberal Conspiracy in 1960s Britain?

A Fertility Storm Gathers While 'Global Warming' Has Us All Looking at the Wrong Problem and in the Wrong Direction

WHY Abortion Should Be Immediately Banned in Anglo-Saxon Countries...

Abortion is a self-imposed curse upon our European, American and Australasian formerly Christian peoples; only the forces of Islam can benefit...

T he environmentalists are doing it again!

Back in the 1960s they had us all worrying because too many children were (supposedly) being born. We were all warned of "worldwide economic havoc" to arrive by the 1980s. The US, we were informed, would be finished, so would India, so would China. Well, we all now know that these people were hopelessly wrong and could not even interpret their own data. In fact, India and China have become incredible economic success stories of this early 21st century! According to the United Nations, India will pass China as the most populous nation in the world by 2030.

Typical of the failed 1960s depopulation extremists were people like Paul Ehrlich. Back in the 60s, Ehrlich stated this:

"We must cut out the cancer of population growth. Coercion? Perhaps, but coercion in a good cause ... We must be relentless in pushing for population control."
(Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb, 1968).

As Michael Fumento has pointed out,

For three decades now, Ehrlich, a butterfly specialist, has made an incredibly successful career out of being incredibly wrong on some of the most important matters of the day. He began his spectacular doomsaying career back in 1968 with his best-selling book The Population Bomb. Among his predictions then and since:

1. "The battle to feed humanity is over. In the 1970s the world will undergo famines [and] hundreds of millions of people [including Americans] are going to starve to death." (1968).
2. "Smog disasters" in 1973 might kill 200,000 people in New York and Los Angeles. (1969).
3. "I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000." (1969).
4. "Before 1985 mankind will enter a genuine age of scarcity . . . in which the accessible supplies of many key minerals will be facing depletion." (1976).

(source: http://www.fumento.com/paul.html).

By the 1980s it was obvious that such writers had overcooked their own soup to a massive degree; they had sought to dramatize and to sensationalize a problem which had never been a problem to more wise and experienced voices in their own fields.

But - nothing daunted - these people are suddenly back on the scene and once again warning of the "urgent need" to step-up 'family planning' training (the use of contraceptives) right across the world; to this end, baseless and groundless 'over-population' scare tactics are again being shamelessly employed, even when the actual facts reveal that this world is heading for a major under-population crisis within fifty years! These truly myopic pseudo-environmentalists are once again avidly supported by the United Nations and these leftist political propagandists are apparently either ignorant of, or willlingly blind, to the amazing lack of babies now being born in many countries.

China is a prime example. As already stated, the world's most populous nation looks set to lose that title by about 2030 with India taking it's place. This is due to China's truly inhuman imposition of it's own grotesque and cruel form of 'family planning.' In the case of China this is especially important because it has been such a populous nation contributing so heavily to world population. Approximately 37% of China's population is currently subject to that nation's 'one-child-only' restriction, although the policy does not apply to Hong Kong and Macao.

The Chinese government introduced this policy back in 1979, supposedly to alleviate social, economic, and environmental problems in China, and authorities claim that the policy has prevented more than 250 million births from it's 1979 implementation to 2000, a period of a mere 21 years. The policy is controversial both within and outside China because of the bullying and heavy-handed manner in which the policy is often implemented, and because of concerns about negative economic and social consequences. The policy has been implicated in an increase in forced Chinese abortions and female infanticide, and is unquestionably the cause of China's significant and growing gender imbalance (not enough girls being born). Many impartial observers are stating that the lack of female children now being tolerated in China will lead to a very serious gender crisis well within fifty years. So China is set to very quickly lose it's status as the major contributor to world population.

The continent of Africa too is fast developing a birth crisis, some of it due to various misguided United Nations-inspired depopulation initiatives. This is to say nothing of AIDS, or what has claimed to be "AIDS." Now, it has certainly been claimed by some that "AIDS" as such does not exist but is a convenient 'umbrella term' for a horrendous plague (or group of plagues or illnesses) currently affecting Africa (a few even claiming that it was intentionally introduced for birth-control purposes; others have claimed that neither HIV nor AIDS are real, never having been isolated in any laboratory), but for the purposes of this article we assume that 'AIDS' (or, some current African disease epidemic) is real. Uganda alone is said to have 150,000 children currently living with AIDS (most of these will never reach adulthood. source: http://www.panos.org.uk/?lid=23427). Then there is South Africa; this country is suffering one of the most severe AIDS epidemics in the world. Almost six million people live with HIV in the country, with about 1,000 people dying from AIDS-related illnesses every day. Many are children. Their HIV-positive mothers pass the virus on to them during birth. Antiretroviral drugs have long been available to stop this happening. But few HIV-positive South African women have access to the life-saving medicines, and tens of thousands of babies continue to be born with the lethal virus (source: http://www.aegis.com/news/voa/2009/VA090517.html). The problem will intensify before it can ever be solved. And this looks at just two African nations. Overall, something between 20,000 and 35,000 Africans are said to be dying from AIDS-related illnesses (or, at least some sort/sorts of disease/diseases) every single week, probably up to a third of these being children under 7 years! Even the mighty continent of Africa cannot continue to sustain such figures and the likelihood is that Africa will eventually enter an under-birthing crisis, although it is probably not there just yet. Yet at such a time in which better health care should be the priority, 'family planners' are stepping-up their efforts to reduce African population. Most of these initiatives continue to be inspired by the failed UN depopulation voices and influences which were predicting over-population-inspired economic catastrophe for the US, India and China by the 1980s.

But even worse than the above situations in Africa and China, will surely be the effects of two modern, western under-birthing plagues:

1. Abortion.

2. The Western Male Fertiility Crisis.

1. First of all, with regard to abortion, Jeanne E. Head, R.N., writes,

"This assault on the most innocent and most vulnerable members of the human family has resulted in the deaths of over 36,000,000 innocent unborn children in the United States alone. More Americans are being destroyed by abortion in one year (over 1.3 million to 1.5 million) than have been destroyed In all our wars." (source: http://www.fww.org/articles/wfpforum/jhead.htm).

The evil, persistent and manipulative scheming of anti-Christian, liberal, usually leftist-influenced forces in numerous countries since the 1960s in order to get abortion universally-recognised and approved should surely make one shudder at how such mass-evil can so easily assume a 'caring and compassionate human face.' When I was a lad back in the 1950s, nobody dreamed that abortion - so widely hated and despised by all - would become a favourite policy of liberal governments within around 20-25 years! Even when this loathsome policy appeared, begging for respectability, back in the late 1960s, the general public feeling was that it was doomed to failure within 5-10 years. Surely, the general feeling went, those parts of the world with such a strong Christian heritage would reject this especially gross inhumanity to man after, perhaps, a few years of unwise experimentation with the policy. But, no, the policy has remained and developed; very soon no longer just considered to be for the unfortunate victims of rape but, in our early 21st century, a matter of convenience for the busy salaried modern woman who has no intention of giving up her job in order to have a child! And this is despite the fact that improvements in medical knowledge now leave one in no doubt that the foetus in the womb, even from an early stage, is a living, active, thumb-sucking little child just eager to be born!

But how could such formerly stalwart Christian nations as Britain and the USA have seen abortion become so widely accepted within their borders?

1960s Socialist Plot Based in Britain?

From an origin in atheistic Marxist social theory (yes, just the sort of social theory avidly supported by Hitler and Stalin, a theory which saw no problem in simply eliminating the socially-inconvenient!), abortion was quietly promoted by the liberal/socialist forces within Harold Wilson's 1960s Labour Government in Britain, and the insidious contagion appears to have spread from there to America and the rest of Europe. The early British public 'figurehead' promoter of abortion was Scottish Liberal MP Mr David Steel. Steel was responsible for introducing, as a Private Member's Bill, the Abortion Act of 1967, yet there is little doubt that much private plotting and scheming accompanied this event. It is now widely believed that Steel was merely a figurehead for just one step in a largely behind-the-scenes socialist/liberal conspiracy to transform Britain from a stalwart Christian nation into the bastion of modern liberalism; abortion would only be one step in the process and here Steel was useful to a wider agenda which - even he - may have been unaware of at the time. Interestingly and somewhat amazingly, Steel has always considered himself to be a Christian and, in fact, was appointed Lord High Commissioner to the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland in both 2003 and 2004.

Very little has yet come out into the public spotlight on much of this but I do know that around 2004-2005 UK Apologetics had some contact with a former Labour Party MP, who later converted to Christianity, who furnished certain inside information to them on the entire matter. Roy Jenkins (1920-2003), the former Home Secretary in Wilson's 1960s Labour Government, is usually heavily implicated in the 'wheeling and dealing' which went on. Jenkins is widely regarded as the chief architect of modern British and European Liberalism. He held a strong agenda to overturn Britain's Christian heritage with 'modern liberal values,' using his strong and pervasive influence within Wilson's government as a base for his ultra-liberal intrigues, yet the British people were never made aware of any of this at the time, and no electoral mandate had ever been sought, nor granted, on these grounds. Much of this social plan development occurred behind closed doors by men apparently sworn to secrecy until the time was right. This may well sound like yet another 'conspiracy theory' - but this all actually happened even though, for the present, comparatively little has emerged on it. When a lot more finally emerges into the public limelight (which it will), remember, you read it here first!

Typical of the liberal reforming zeal of Wilson's government were people like Leo Abse MP (1917-2008). Abse (pronounced like 'Absey'), a man of Jewish descent, was a lawyer, politician and homosexual rights campaigner who was noted for promoting private member's bills to decriminalise male homosexual relations and to liberalise the divorce laws wherever he could.
When Labour came into power, Abse soon produced his own pro-homosexuality Bill. Despite the Labour landslide election victory of 1966, bisexual Leo Abse's proposed bill to establish a new law, was still considered vulnerable but he managed to persuade the afore-mentioned senior government minister Roy Jenkins to give the measure government time and backing, which eventually saw the Bill through onto the British statute book in 1967. So Abse's Bill, which legalised full sexual intimacy between consenting men over the age of 21 in private, became law. Such a law would have been unthinkable only a few years earlier, yet it now enjoyed full British governmental support. Of course, the 'over the age of 21' part was only ever a 'sweetener' to help persuade less liberal people; Abse, and most other liberals behind this law change, thought 21 far too old for homosexual consent and thought younger homosexual sex would inevitably follow and that such people would now no longer be under pressure from possible prosecution. This indeed proved to be correct and today British police are actually issued with pro-gay guidelines! It is well-known that a British policeman can now get into serious trouble with his superiors even by making anti-homosexual comments in complete jest! Today, several British police forces encourage their young men and women to become actively involved in 'gay pride' marches and rallies.
Following his success in winning legality for intimate homosexual acts, Leo Abse continued to work tirelessly, but, from now on, mostly to liberalize British divorce law. This led to the 1969 Divorce Reform Act which suddenly made British divorce easy without any need for either party to prove adultery by the other party. A few church leaders strongly protested but, frankly, they did not protest loudly enough. Within a few years British divorce figures skyrocketed. Even many commited liberals have admitted that the British divorce law change was a charter for every immoral adulterer and philanderer (who could afford the litigation costs) to simply dump their ageing wives for younger women, and this seemed to happen on a grand scale during the 1970s before the legal position of such women became much stronger.
In later years Abse caused much controversy by marrying a woman fifty years his junior, his second (longsuffering) wife. A keen supporter of atheism, oral sex and bisexuality, this man was also a keen supporter of just about every odd theory of Sigmund Freud (most of which have long since been debunked within psychology). As Christians, we should not be interested in character-assassination, but to flesh out such details about individuals like Abse, certainly helps us to understand who some of these arch liberals/socialists were, and where they were coming from. It is certainly no exaggeration to say that the socialist reformers in and around the 1960s Wilson government were fully commited to overturning Britain's Christian heritage in favour of a fully liberal society.

The Western Male Fertility Crisis

Before making comments with specific regard to the western fertility crisis, we must also note that the general birth rate has been falling in many countries, certainly right across Europe but also in Japan and many parts of the East (we have already considered China), so there is a world-wide problem of insufficient children being born. Recently Japan has been considering how to encourage her people to have more children because of a worrying fall in the national birth rate. However, very little publicity and virtually no public warning is accompanying the quickly developing male fertility crisis in places such as Europe, America and Australasia. Combined with the widespread practice of abortion, this means that the formerly Christian lands are very quickly headed for major trouble. This - make no mistake - is no exaggeration and certainly not scaremongering.

I have made most of this information available in some detail here, and it is pointless to repeat it here, but, suffice it to say, a major fertility crisis has been developing among modern men from something like the beginning of the 20th century. The full recognition of the problem is probably traceable to the work of the Danish physician Dr Niels Skakkebaek who, in 1992, decided to analyse the results of all the studies of sperm production that had been conducted since the 1930s. He found what he had long expected, that is, that modern European men now produce semen of far less quality than their grandfathers did. As a result, something like 18%-20% of modern couples now experience fertility problems, this, combined with the effects of abortion, mean that the average British modern married couple are now only producing 1.7 children (2.2 is the figure for society to maintain itself). These figures are repeated across much of Europe and America. Frankly, Europeans, and perhaps especially Anglo-Saxons, are on the wane as a race! For this reason, I submit that abortion should be immediately banned in Anglo-Saxon countries. In fact, it should be banned everywhere if a major crisis is to be averted. Interestingly, and perhaps worryingly, the world of Islam is going in the opposite direction. This is the real reason that our nations are being flooded with immigrants from the Islamic East (that is, because our behind-the-scenes anonymous, unnamed social planners suddenly realised one day that within a few decades our elderly peoople will be in the majority with insufficient young people to fuel the economy. Again, this was decided with no mandate from the people).

Probably for many years to come, liberals will continue to deny that any of this is a problem; they are currently employing scare tactics about 'global warming' and 'swine flu,' (probably purely diversionary) because they pursue an unwritten agenda of wanting a small world population and are not happy for the public to have easy access to some of this information.
Mike deHavilland Parker. 2009.

(A conspiracy theory? I have never supported conspiracy theories but sometimes you do wonder. I do know that after my first article appeared in 2007, feverish attempts were made by UK governmental and civil service authorities to find out who I am and whether I am employed by either of the former. Believe me, if I had been, I would have been fired! But I am independently employed).