UK APOLOGETICS: FROM THE EDITOR
LATE SUMMER, 2010.

It's Time That The Continual BBC Promotion of Atheists and Atheism Was Challenged

Robin Brace, Senior Site Editor


I t is little short of astonishing how many prominent atheists have been given encouragement and support by the BBC (the British Broadcasting Corporation) during the last half-century or so, but especially during the last 10-15 years. Many of these individuals are freely given their own television series, whereas theists, committed Christians, and especially climate change 'deniers,' are always downgraded by the BBC (climate change deniers are dropped even where they had been 'major players.' A good example here is the formerly hugely popular television personality David Bellamy who had continually featured in BBC TV programming on science, but especially on botanical and ecology issues; Bellamy was quickly dropped by the corporation upon his well-publicised challenge to so-called 'climate change').

Atheists who have been outrageously promoted by the BBC include the truly awful atheistic propagandists Jonathan Miller and Richard Dawkins, but extend to Sir David Attenborough, one of the major controllers of the BBC. Without doubt Attenborough is popular yet - make no mistake - he is an avowed atheist. In fact, some believe that it is the huge influence of Attenborough at the BBC which has restricted Christianity, and even Theism, to the very margins of any serious consideration in TV programming. Sir David, according to the Daily Telegraph, tops a league table of academic honours-receivers, having received at least 29 honorary degrees from British universities, more than any other person. This is according to a table of Britain's most honoured compiled by The Sunday Telegraph. Let us make it plain, in case some misunderstand, that honorary degrees are awarded without study. Attenborough, the tireless promoter of both Darwinism and the equally mythical 'human population explosion' theory, holds, we are reliably informed, a single zoology degree from Cambridge.

It is noticeable that in most any BBC documentary-type programme, whether on history or science, atheism is simply assumed to be the untarnished truth whereas the central tenets of Christianity are assumed to be "purely mythical." Science is not to be challenged even when the principles thereof are frequently expounded in a manner which is plainly 80% speculation.

Here are some more examples of atheists regularly promoted by this broadcasting body:

That is not the total of it. I can think of at least another 25 or so top BBC personalities whom - I believe - are atheists but I can find no confessions of such by them so I do not name them.

Yet - is it not incredible - that this broadcasting body has so strongly promoted atheists and the view of atheism over so many years? It still remains the case that most opinion polls show that something approaching 70% of Britons are at least loosely in support of Christianity. Rather than being an elitist, leftist and atheistic body, the BBC should more fully represent the views of the British people who pay for it's continued existence through the licence fee.

Another interesting point here is how things have changed at the BBC. If one could go back to the 1950s it is very unlikely that a single atheist would be discovered among British television's leading personalities and pundits, then, perhaps by the early 70s, a few would indeed be found but not many. Now, in the year of 2010, atheists are probably very close to being in the majority of BBC personalities. What does this tell us? It illustrates how the BBC has mirrored changes in British society and it is not good news. The proliferation of social liberals - many of them atheists - into almost every area of our life has coincided with the amazing drop in moral standards and in the moral fibre of the British people. Why should we be shocked at the level of crime among our young, a level which has turned London into the stabbings capital of the western world! Why should we be shocked at the dreadful level of abortions, or of divorce? Instead of being taught the rudiments of the Christian Faith from an early age, our children are now only being taught the rudiments of godless Darwinism with it's utterly hopeless message that 'the survival of the fittest' is all that matters in life. The appalling decline in standards of the BBC simply mirrors those things - at least to a degree.

However, while the BBC could be said to be mirroring a depressing decline in British moral standards, the decline among ordinary Britons is not quite as dramatic as the BBC example might lead one to believe. As already stated, it remains the case that a majority of the British continue to identify with Christianity whereas a majority at the BBC seem to identify with atheism. The BBC more closely mirrors that wooly, insipid, anti-supernaturalist, leftist liberalism that has grown among the British intelligentsia. This is the sort of pathetic liberalism that has led to the curse of political-correctness and to the idiocy of threatening to fire nurses who offer to pray for very sick patients and threatening to fire air hostesses who wear crosses around their necks (in case it offends people who are not Christian). The BBC now appear to be led by people who don't really believe in anything (excepting leftist Darwinistic liberalism and in a determination to hold onto their own jobs, come what may!) Very strangely, only Islam is afforded respect as a religion, as the BBC (like the British government) continue to hold on to the notion that most Islamics are very good and kind people who should be separated from the "Islamic fundamentalists." They think this way because they simply don't understand the teachings of the major religions.

But, the question could be asked, why does the spread of atheism even matter? It matters because many of us believe that the acceptance of atheism immediately impairs one's discretion, wisdom and judgment in many areas of life. Let us offer just one brief example: If you were accused of a serious crime which you did not commit, would you prefer to be in the hands of a God-believing judge who believed that we will all be judged someday in the superior court of heaven? Or, would you prefer to be in the hands of a committed atheistic Darwinist, one who has no firm foundation for a sense of morality and who believed that everything on this earth is an accident with the 'survival of the fittest' all that really matters?? I know which sort of judge I would prefer: I would prefer the Theist who believed that there is a God in Heaven who will hold him accountable for getting my judgment wrong.

Robin A. Brace, August, 2010.
UK Apologetics

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional

Just a reminder that we are adding anything from 5 to 15 new articles to our group of websites every single month and if you have become a regular visitor to our Apologetics and Countercult ministry it is best to join our E Letter List system (just ONE E Letter per month and our list is ABSOLUTELY PRIVATE and available to nobody else).
You can put yourself on our E Letter List HERE.
PLEASE NOTE: Other E Mails also go through this e mail system so PLEASE make it CLEAR that you want to go on our E Letter List system and make it clear which e mail address you want us to send your e mails to. .



SITES WE NO LONGER USE:
Since some have inquired about this, let me make it plain that our main work is now heavily concentrated on three sites, and WE NO LONGER USE our MSN, TopCities, Jesus.Net, Freewebs.com, Bravenet, I PowerHosts, Brinkster or SP Hosting sites (too many ads, too many technical problems or too many unexplained page deletions on those sites - you may wish to be warned!), also our Museltof's Smorgasbord site is discontinued from late June 2006 because there was really no need to keep that site going. However, we are not happy about the way the 'smorgasbord' actually finished. After being promised a continual free site our homepage was suddenly shut down with absolutely no warning; I'm afraid that this is typical of those "free web sites" - please don't trust them!

UPDATE: From May, 2008 we are starting to discontinue our old My Christian World site. This has been a great little site with no ads or problems of any kind and it came free from our ISP (at the time, NTL, later being taken over by Virgin Media), but we simply no longer need that site to continue. We are phasing the site out gradually from April, 2008 but it could still last another year or so.

So our main work is now on these sites:

Museltof Countercult and Apologetics (www.museltof.org.uk/)
We are happy to say that from Autumn 2006 this site is no longer on OurChurch.com web space but on our own puchased web space - this frees this site from the sometimes dreadful "Christian ads" which marred its pages at times. In the end, it just was not acceptable that a site warning of cults sometimes carried ads purchased by such cults!! However, we remain grateful to OurChurch.com for giving us a great start.
UK Apologetics(www.ukapologetics.net/)
A new site which we started developing from March, 2005. We have purchased this site space and this is now our main site. Even by April, 2006 this huge site contains almost 500 articles! (Update: In May, 2008 our site articles are closing-in on 900!) This has also become the top Apologetics resource in Europe in view of both its size and its huge number of 'hits.'
Witness to the Word (www.ukapologetics.net/witnessindex.htm) .
'Witness to the Word' is now included under our 'UK Apologetics' hosting server situation. The search engine on our UK Apologetics homepage also finds articles on this site.
Your Brother in Christ,
Robin A. Brace



Please don't forget to consider going on our E-Letter list. We send out just ONE E-Letter per month which announces the articles for the new month. So around the middle of each month, we announce our articles for the upcoming month. PUT YOURSELF ON OUR LIST HERE!